Assessment
There is no exam for this course.
All assessment is continuous over the year.
Satisfactory attendance,
not lower than 80%, is a necessary condition
for passing the course.
Semester One
|
Semester Two
|
Medical Terminology Test (worth 20%)
MEP Preliminary
Meeting (worth 10%)
|
Minutes from Team Meetings (worth
10%)
MEP Poster Sessions (worth 40%) *
MEP Report (worth 20%)*
|
(* = co assessed by the English
Centre and the Medical Engineering team.)
Criteria
for Assessment of Meetings
Criteria
for Assessment of Minutes
Criteria
for Assessment of Poster Presentation
Criteria
for Assessment of Written Report
Criteria
for Assessment of Meetings
| Discussion
Is on Track |
- Control of the meeting is regained
when/if topic goes off track.
- Smooth transition from one agenda
item to another.
|
| Information
from Interview Is Presented Clearly |
- Technical terms are defined.
- Information is presented concisely.
- Focus is on giving a summary rather
than all information gathered.
- Pronunciation, vocabulary and grammar
are accurate.
|
| Active
Listening Skills Are Shown |
- Nodding and eye contact is used.
- Active listening phrases such as
“ahh”…”mmm” are used
appropriately.
|
| Group
Interaction Skills Are Shown |
- Suggestions are made.
- Information is asked for and given
where necessary.
- Disagreeing is done tactfully when
appropriate.
|
| Meeting
Achieved Aims |
- A decision is made by the end of
the meeting.
- Work is allocated.
|
Criteria
for Assessment of Minutes
| Criteria |
- All key information is present.
- Discussion is separated from action.
- It is grammatically accurate.
- Format is appropriate.
- All components are present e.g.
confirmation of the minutes, matters arising, A.O.B.
etc.
- Tone/register is appropriately formal.
- It can be understood by someone
who was not at the meeting.
- Order of items correspond to the
agenda.
- Selection of information is not
too brief, nor too long.
|
Criteria
for Assessment of Poster Presentation
| Language |
- It is concise.
- It is grammatically accurate.
- There is appropriate use of technical
vocabulary.
|
| Layout |
- Appearance is attention-grabbing
and professional.
- Font size, colour and spacing are
appropriately used.
|
| Content |
- Depth of information is appropriate.
- Organization is clear and logical.
- Graphics and text are integrated.
- There is no plagiarism.
- There are correctly formatted academic
references.
- All features of a poster are present
e.g. title, heading, labels for graphics, citation,
references, acknowledgements.
|
| Audience
Awareness |
- Eye contact is maintained.
- Gestures are used to aid understanding.
- Pace is appropriate.
- Confidence is shown.
- Visual aids are explained to aid
understanding.
|
Criteria
for Assessment of Written Report
| Content |
- Content is logically organized.
- Terminology is defined where necessary.
- The aims of the report are fulfilled.
- All sections are included e.g. contents
page, introduction, executive summary etc.
- There is a good selection of graphics.
- Text and graphics are integrated.
- Logical conclusions and recommendations
are made.
- The amount of information is appropriate
for the task.
- AMA citation and referencing is
used and accurately formatted.
|
| Language |
- Language is grammatically accurate
e.g. tense.
- There is a consistent used of academic
tone.
- Appropriate technical terminology
is used.
|
| Format |
- Clear headings are given and a consistent
numbering system is used.
- Layout looks professional.
- The report is between 8-10 pages long.
|
|